28.1 C
Delhi
Tuesday, September 17, 2024

Lacoste wins the trademark battle against Crocodile; Delhi High Court grants permanent injunction

Delhi High Court Rules in Favor of Lacoste in Trademark Battle Against Crocodile International

New Delhi, August 14, 2024

In a landmark decision, the Delhi High Court has settled a long-standing legal dispute between two iconic brands: Lacoste and Crocodile International. The battle over trademark rights has finally come to an end, with Justice Narula delivering a judgment in favor of Lacoste.

The Hon’ble Delhi High Court on August 14, 2024, granted a permanent injunction for infringement against Crocodile International, restraining them from using the contested mark. The Hon’ble Court also ordered the Crocodile to remit the full litigation cost to Lacoste, as a punitive measure.

The conflict centered around the use of a crocodile logo by both Lacoste and Crocodile International. Lacoste, a renowned French brand, has been synonymous with its signature crocodile emblem since the 1930s. The little green crocodile adorns Lacoste’s polo shirts, sportswear, and other clothing items, making it instantly recognizable worldwide.

However, Crocodile International, a Singapore-based company, also used a similar crocodile logo. The dispute arose when both brands sought exclusive rights to their respective crocodile trademarks in various markets, including China and other parts of Asia.

The Legal Battle

René Lacoste, the famous French tennis player nicknamed “Le Crocodile,” created the crocodile logo for Lacoste’s polo shirts. The brand’s success led to international recognition, and Lacoste applied for trademark registration in China in 1980.

In other Asian markets, Crocodile International had already registered a reverse image of the crocodile logo. Coexistence agreements were signed between Lacoste and Crocodile International, allowing both trademarks to exist in specific countries and regions.

When Lacoste entered the Chinese market in 1984, it discovered that Crocodile International had also expressed interest in the mainland market. Disputes over trademark infringement ensued.

The legal battle spanned decades, involving multiple court proceedings. Lacoste argued that Crocodile International’s use of the crocodile logo caused confusion and infringed on its rights.

After years of litigation, the single bench of the Hon’ble Delhi High Court ruled in favor of Lacoste. Justice Narula permanently injuncted the Crocodile International from using a similar crocodile mark as Lacoste. The court recognized Lacoste’s exclusive ownership of the crocodile device trademark.

After years of litigation, the single bench of the Hon’ble Delhi High Court ruled in favor of Lacoste. Justice Narula permanently injuncted the Crocodile International from using a similar crocodile mark as Lacoste. The court recognized Lacoste’s exclusive ownership of the crocodile device trademark.

This judgment reinforces the importance of protecting well-known trademarks and preventing confusion in the marketplace. Lacoste’s victory sets a precedent for brand owners seeking to safeguard their iconic logos.

Lacoste was represented by Sr. Advocate Chander M. Lall, Adv. Nancy Roy, Adv. Raghav Malik, and others of the Lall & Sethi Law firm throughout the legal battle.

Case : Lacoste & Anr. V/s Crocodile International Pte Ltd. & Anr CS(COMM)1550/2016

Most Popular Articles