33.1 C
Tuesday, October 4, 2022

US Supreme Court to Hear Turkish Lender Halkbank’s Bid to Avoid Charges

https://ift.tt/yzwjFmd U.S. Supreme Court on Monday agreed...

Foreign Influence Campaigns Ramp Up to Target US Voters

https://ift.tt/muqoSFe. voting systems appear to be safe...

US, Philippine Forces Hold Combat Drills to Brace for Crisis

https://ift.tt/Td8HZIx than 2,500 U.S. and Philippine marines...

SC: Refuses early hearing on hijab ban

New Delhi: The Supreme Court today refused associate early hearing on pleas difficult the Karnataka High Court finding on the Karnataka government’s ban on hijabs within classrooms.

The petitioners had sought early listing of the difficulty citing future school examinations. The judge of India chided Advocate Devdutt Kamat, who was representing the petitioner Muslim student Aishat Shifa, asking him to not “sensationalize the issue”.

Mr. Kamat sought imperative listing of the matter saying students are being denied the choice to wear hijabs whereas showing for exams.

He said that exams are beginning on March 28 and the student would lose a year as authorities aren’t allowing entry with a hijab.

“This has nothing to try and do with exams. Don’t sensationalize the issue,” the CJI aforementioned whereas also refusing to entertain an intervention from the law officer Tushar Mehta as well.

On March 16, the Supreme Court had united to list after Holi the pleas difficult the Karnataka state supreme court order on hijab ban in academic institutions.

On March 15, the Karnataka state supreme court had upheld the state government’s ban on hijab in lecture rooms saying it was not an important religious practice of the monotheism faith.

The difficulty of hijab is generated and blown out of proportion by the powers that be, the state supreme court had said, adding that “some unseen hands are at work to engineer social unrest and disharmony”.

The hijab ban issue has snowballed into a national headline-grabbing dispute as political parties have become an opportunity to attack their rivals.

Several students have said they might currently don’t have any choice but to drop out of state schools, and also the restrictive price of personal education would mean not continuing with school at all.

The 5 young women from Karnataka’ Udupi — whose petition seeking that hijab be allowed in lecture rooms got turned down by the High Court had told the media that they need to be “denied elementary rights” and feel “betrayed by the country”.

Demand that the difficulty of hijab, which should are “resolved at an area level, currently has acquired political and communal overtones,” they said they will, however, not drop out of school owing to the setback.

A police case was filed against unknown individuals last week for allegedly threatening the Karnataka High Court judge over the order on the hijab ban.

The government had said it’ll give “Y category” security {to all|to all or associatey|to any or all} the 3 judges who gave the verdict on the hijab matter.

In an exceedingly initial data Report, lawyer Umapathi S alleged he received a video message on WhatsApp that gave an “open threat of murder” to judge Ritu rule Awasthi.

The row had started in December last year as students at a school in Udupi refused to get rid of headscarves and stop their use despite requests from teachers. 5 students then went to court.

As the protests spread, a district of students turned up in saffron scarves, arguing they were also connected to religious identity. Dalit students adopted blue to show support for the hijab.

Support Us

Secured by Paypal

Related Stories

Check out other tags:

Most Popular Articles