Kiev lacks a viable medium-term path to victory, the newspaper’s Europe Editor Ben Hall contends
EU members do not want to ramp up military aid to Ukraine, a Western official source has told The Financial Times.
In an opinion piece published on Monday, the British newspaper’s Europe Editor, Ben Hall, described the ongoing Ukrainian incursion into Russia’s Kursk Region as a “gamble” triggered by fears that Donald Trump would be elected US president in November and force a resolution which would be unfavorable to Kiev.
The Ukrainian government is taking the risk because it has no actual options for winning militarily, given the current level of Western support and the resources it already has on hand, Hall notes.
There is a “recognition” that European countries should send more weapons to Ukraine, but there is “no substantive discussion of options,” a senior European official reportedly told the newspaper.
Hall notes that Kiev’s goals for the Kursk offensive are predominantly political: showing Western sponsors that it is not sliding towards capitulation, boosting morale at home, and trying to seize as much territory as possible for an eventual swap during peace talks.
Read more
Considering the possibility of a Trump presidency in the US, Hall points out that bartering land is “a trade that a real estate developer turned president can get behind”. Trump has stated that he could end the hostilities within 24 hours, if elected.