US Vice President JD Vance has accused Denmark of failing to adequately protect Greenland from external threats, particularly from Russia and China. He suggested that the United States would be better suited to ensure the island’s security, continuing Washington’s focus on great-power competition, as noted by a Chinese expert.
During his visit to the US military base at Pituffik, located in northern Greenland, Vance stated that while the US does not plan to immediately expand its military presence, it will bolster resources, including additional naval ships. He criticized Denmark for not allocating sufficient resources to safeguard Greenland’s population from what he called “very aggressive incursions” by nations like Russia and China, as reported by Reuters.
Vance highlighted the strategic importance of the Arctic, citing significant interest from Russia, China, and other nations in its passageways, naval routes, and mineral reserves. He asserted that the US has “no option” but to assume a leadership role in Greenland’s security, even backing Greenlandic calls for independence from Denmark. This stance has historically triggered resistance from Greenlandic lawmakers and residents, according to the Associated Press.
Denmark Responds to US Allegations
Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen rebutted Vance’s remarks, calling them “unfair.” She emphasized Denmark’s defense contributions in the Arctic, including investments in Arctic ships and long-range drones. Frederiksen stated, “We are a good and strong ally,” citing Denmark’s support for the US in global conflicts, such as the war on terror, as reported by AP.
Broader Implications and Expert Insights
US President Donald Trump reiterated the importance of Greenland for American international security, calling it an integral asset. Trump has previously expressed an interest in acquiring the island, which has been under Danish control since 1721, according to Reuters.
Chinese academics view the US’s Arctic strategy as part of its “obsession with great-power competition.” Li Haidong, a professor at China Foreign Affairs University, said the US is using the “China, Russia threat” narrative as a pretext to pursue its strategic goals. “The US treats Greenland’s rich resources and strategic sea routes as part of its geopolitical calculus. Washington’s coercive stance reflects its outdated power politics,” Li remarked.
Li further criticized the US, saying its attempts to frame China as a threat cannot conceal its own opportunistic ambitions. “The more Washington slanders China, the clearer it becomes who is undermining the rules-based order,” he added.
China’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian also commented on the situation, emphasizing adherence to the principles of the UN Charter in international relations.