27.1 C
Delhi
Sunday, September 15, 2024

US opposes plans to make WHO more independent

Brussels – The United States, a major contributor to the World Health Organization, is opposed to proposals to make the organization independent, say four officials who took part in the talks, raising doubts about Biden’s long-standing support for UN agencies.

The proposal, made by the WHO Working Group on Sustainable Funding, will increase the contribution of each member state annually, according to a WHO online publication dated January 4th.

The program is part of a broader transformation process reinforced by the COVID-19 epidemic, which highlights the WHO’s ability to intervene in the emergence of a disaster.

But the US government opposes the change because it has concerns about the WHO’s ability to deal with future threats, including those from China, U.S. officials told Reuters.

Instead it strives to create a separate fund, directly managed by donors, that can fund and prevent and control health emergencies.

Four European officials involved in the talks, who declined to be named because they were not authorized to speak to the media, confirmed the U.S. opposition. The US government did not immediately comment.

The published proposal calls for compulsory donations from member states to increase gradually from 2024 to account for the main budget of $ 2 billion by 2028, compared to less than 20% now, the statement said.

The WHO’s main budget is aimed at fighting the epidemic and strengthening health care systems around the world. It also raises another $ 1 billion or more a year to address some of the global challenges such as tropical diseases and the flu.

Proponents of her case have been working to make the actual transcript of this statement available online.

An independent epidemiological team appointed to advise on WHO reforms has called for increased funding, to 75% of the main budget, seeing the current program as a “major threat to the integrity and independence” of the WHO. .

The WHO itself answered the question by saying that “only flexible and predictable funding can enable WHO to take full advantage of Member States’ priorities.”

Top European Union sponsors, including Germany, are reviving the program, along with many African countries, South Asia, South America and the Arabs, say three European officials.

The proposal will be discussed at a WHO executive council meeting next week but the split means no agreement is expected, three officials said.

The WHO has so far confirmed that there is no consensus among member states, and said that talks could continue until the annual meeting of the World Health Assembly in May.

European donors especially prefer to empower, rather than weaken, international organizations, including the WHO.

One European official said the US plan was “creating suspicion in many countries,” and said the construction of a new donor-controlled structure, not the WHO, would weaken the organisation’s ability to fight the coming epidemic.

Washington has long criticized the WHO.

Former President Donald Trump ousted the United States from the WHO after accusing it of preventing China’s initial delay in data sharing when the COVID-19 was released there in 2019.

Biden officials re-joined shortly after taking office, but officials said they thought the WHO needed a major overhaul, and raised concerns about its governance, structure and ability to deal with growing threats, not least from China.

One European official said that other major countries, including Japan and Brazil, also questioned the WHO’s published proposal.

Two European officials said China had not yet clarified its position, and a third official listed Beijing among critics for the proposal.

The governments of Japan, China and Brazil could not immediately comment.

Most Popular Articles