‘Imagine if it were Moscow?’ How prominent Russians have reacted to arrest of Telegram founder Durov

By Updates

August 26, 2024

Updates

Facebook Twitter Reddit WhatsApp LinkedIn Pinterest Email Print Tumblr

Some believe the St Petersburg-born tycoon has paid for his naivety, others want his homeland to intervene

On Saturday night, Telegram’s founder and frontman Pavel Durov was arrested by French police. The Saint Petersburg native – who is also a citizen of France, the UAE and St Kitts & Nevis – has yet to be charged, but news outlets are claiming he faces a long jail sentence.

Here, some leading Russian media and political voices react to the news that has shaken the internet.

Dmitry Medvedev, Head of the Russian Security Council and former president of Russia:

A while back, indeed a long time ago, I asked Durov why he did not want to cooperate with law enforcement agencies on serious crimes. ‘This is my principled position’ he said. ‘Then, you will have serious problems in every country,’ I told him.

He thought his biggest issues were in Russia, so he left and then got citizenship and/or residency in other countries. He wanted to be a brilliant ‘man of the world’ who could live perfectly well without his homeland. Ubi bene ibi patria (where there is bread, there is country)!

He miscalculated. To all our common enemies, he is still Russian – and therefore unpredictable and dangerous. Of a different blood. Certainly not Musk or Zuckerberg (who, by the way, is actively cooperating with the FBI). Durov should finally realize that the fatherland, like the times, cannot be chosen…

Read more

Fyodor Lukyanov, the editor-in-chief of Russia in Global Affairs:

Modernity is moving in mysterious ways. In a sense, Pavel Durov could occupy the niche recently vacated by Julian Assange (who, incidentally, has yet to speak out since his release). However, Assange was the embodiment of the collective Left, which was most prominent in raising the issue of his persecution. Durov, on the other hand, will be defended by the conservative flank.

Andrey Medvedev, journalist, TV presenter, politician and deputy speaker of the Moscow City Duma

Durov’s arrest in itself might not have caused a stir in Russia. Were it not for one circumstance.

As it happens, he is a major figure in the current war. Telegram is an alternative to closed military communication. Probably from today on, the question of creating a military messenger for our army will become vital.

For how long Telegram will remain as we know it, and whether it will continue as a messenger at all, is now hard to predict.

Evgeny Primakov, Head of the Federal Agency for the Commonwealth of Independent States, [Russian] Compatriots Living Abroad and International Humanitarian Cooperation

About Pavel Durov: don’t forget that ‘democracy’ is the rule of democrats, never mind all this ‘freedom’ stuff. That’s why Western Europe and the broader Western world have the most democracy.

And also note how the [British state broadcaster] BBC’s Russian service is noticeably holding its tongue about Durov’s arrest. Firstly, because the editors have not been given instructions [from London]; secondly, because how can they explain it without putting their dear friends in a bad light; thirdly, I repeat, the power of democrats. It wasn’t the evil FSB that threw a freedom-loving fighter for freedom into prison. This is different, you must understand.

Read more

Margarita Simonyan, RT editor-in-chief

Pavel Durov left Russia to avoid cooperation with the security services. He even became Paul du Rov. He partially cooperated with Western intelligence services – at least he strictly followed orders to block RT in those countries where we are under sanctions. It didn’t help him.

What is the main lesson from the Durov story? That anyone who has used Telegram for sensitive conversations/texts should delete it now and never use it again. Because Durov was arrested to take away his keys. And he’s going to give them up.

Georgy Bovt, political analyst, journalist

Russia and Azerbaijan have a treaty of 22 December 1992 on mutual legal assistance and legal relations in civil, family and criminal matters. So, in theory, Russia could have issued an arrest warrant for Durov, last week, on roughly the same charges as the French have, and then requested his extradition from Azerbaijan, where he flew to before going to France.

This would have been followed by widespread Western European wailing about ‘human rights violations and trampling on freedom of speech’ by two authoritarian ‘bloody regimes.’ Especially if – and it would have been easy to build a case – he had been accused of “discrediting” the Russian army. Durov would have been declared a ‘prisoner of conscience’ and a fight for his release would have been launched. But the arrest at Le Bourget is different, of course.